Mayo Clinic Health Manager
Get free personalized health guidance for you and your family.
Get StartedHormone therapy for breast cancer: Pros and cons
By Mayo Clinic staff| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Tamoxifen | |
| Reduces chance of recurrence and of cancer developing in the other breast | Slightly increases risk of uterine cancers, cataracts and blood clots; causes short-term side effects such as hot flashes and vaginal discharge |
| In women with hormone receptor positive cancer, inhibits growth of cancer cells | Has no benefit for women with hormone receptor negative cancer |
| Preserves and may even increase bone density in postmenopausal women | In premenopausal women, increases risk of osteoporosis |
| Doesn't cause menopause in premenopausal women | Requires a lengthy course of treatment, up to five years |
| Costs less than aromatase inhibitors | |
| Aromatase inhibitors | |
| In women with hormone receptor positive cancer, inhibit growth of cancer cells, and in some trials, have been shown to do so better than tamoxifen | Not an option for premenopausal women |
| Side effects generally mild | Cause mild, short-term side effects including hot flashes, joint pain, muscle aches, and vaginal dryness and irritation; put you at increased risk of osteoporosis and bone fractures |
| Can be used as an extended adjuvant treatment option for women who have been on five years of tamoxifen therapy | Require a lengthy course of treatment, up to five years |
| Fairly new therapy so long-term side effects not yet fully understood | |
| More expensive than tamoxifen, especially if you have to pay out-of-pocket for prescriptions | |