• image.alt
  • With Mayo Clinic nutritionists

    Jennifer Nelson, M.S., R.D. and Katherine Zeratsky, R.D.

    read biography

Free

E-newsletter

Subscribe to Housecall

Our weekly general interest
e-newsletter keeps you up to date on a wide variety of health topics.

Sign up now
  • Nutrition-wise blog

  • March 19, 2010

    Misleading food labels prompt FDA action

    By Jennifer Nelson, M.S., R.D. and Katherine Zeratsky, R.D.

16 comments posted

Recipes for Healthy Living

Subscribe to our Recipes for Healthy Living e-newsletter for healthy and tasty recipes.

Sign up now

In the past few weeks, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has sent warnings to 17 manufacturers about false or misleading nutrition information on the food labels of 22 of their products. The products cited include juices, teas, ice creams, baby foods, olive oil, salad dressings and vegetable shortening.

Why is this important? More and more shoppers are using food labels to make important food choices — and we should expect food labels to be truthful, not misleading. At the very least, it's irritating to consume "extra light" olive oil thinking that "light" means lower in fat and calories only to find that it's only "light" in color or taste. At worst, it would be tragic to have a heart attack and discover that "trans-fat-free" foods high in saturated fat were clogging your arteries.

Examples of misleading claims on food labels include:

Claim: "Extra Light Olive Oil."
Violation: The term "light" is misleading because the fat content is not reduced by 50 percent compared to a similar appropriate reference food. (The manufacturer recently altered the label to read "Extra Light Tasting Olive Oil.")

Claim: "0 grams trans fat"
Violation: The products cited do not have disclosure statements alerting consumers that the products have significant levels of saturated and total fat.

Claim: "No added refined sugar," "Plus fiber" or "Plus calcium" on baby food labels
Violation: Nutrient claims are not allowed on products intended for children younger than 2 years of age because dietary levels have not been established for this age group.

Manufacturers were given 15 days to inform the FDA about their plans to correct the violations. If the response is not satisfactory, the result could be injunctions against the manufacturers including product seizures.

I'm glad to see the FDA stepping up to enforce truth in labeling. What's your take? What do you find confusing about food labels?

- Jennifer

16 comments posted

blog index
References
  1. Nutrition initiative: Questions and answers. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/ucm202734.htm. Accessed March 16, 2010.
  2. FDA calls on food companies to correct labeling violations. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm202814.htm. Accessed March 16, 2010.
  3. Understanding front-of-package violations: Why warning letters are sent to industry. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/Food/LabelingNutrition/ucm202784.htm. Accessed March 16, 2010.
MY01242 March 19, 2010

© 1998-2013 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (MFMER). All rights reserved. A single copy of these materials may be reprinted for noncommercial personal use only. "Mayo," "Mayo Clinic," "MayoClinic.com," "EmbodyHealth," "Enhance your life," and the triple-shield Mayo Clinic logo are trademarks of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.

  • Print
  • Share on:

  • Email

Advertisement


Text Size: smaller largerlarger