• image.alt
  • With Mayo Clinic nutritionists

    Jennifer Nelson, M.S., R.D. and Katherine Zeratsky, R.D.

    read biography

Free

E-Newsletters

Subscribe to receive the latest updates on health topics. About our newsletters

  • Housecall
  • Alzheimer's caregiving
  • Living with cancer
  • Nutrition-wise blog

  • Dec. 4, 2009

    Wild game — A healthy choice?

    By Jennifer Nelson, M.S., R.D. and Katherine Zeratsky, R.D.

8 comments posted

When autumn arrives in my home state of Minnesota, I start getting questions from hunters about the health effects of eating wild game. Deer, elk, caribou and antelope are examples of game meats, and duck, pheasant and turkey are commonly hunted game birds.

In general, wild game is leaner than domesticated animals, because animals in the wild are typically more active. In comparison to lean cuts of beef and pork, game meat has about one-third fewer calories (game birds have about half the calories) and quite a bit less saturated and total fat. Cholesterol for wild and domestic meat ranges from 50 to 75 milligrams for a 3-ounce serving — with wild game tending to be in the lower end of the range.

With game there are a few health-related precautions to keep in mind:

  • Chronic wasting disease (CWD). Similar to mad cow disease, CWD is found in deer and elk. While human infection is a potential concern, there have been no verified cases. To minimize risk, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggests that hunters who harvest deer or elk from known CWD-positive areas consider having the animal tested for CWD before consuming the meat. (Information about testing is available from most state wildlife agencies.) In addition, hunters should take precautions such as avoiding animals that appear ill and following good field-dressing practices, such as wearing gloves and minimizing the handling of brain and spinal cord tissues.
  • Lead levels. A number of studies have demonstrated that lead ammunition can cause lead contamination of game. Whether this is a concern has yet to be determined. However, the CDC recommends discarding portions of game that contain lead bullet fragments or using non-lead ammunition. For those at highest risk of adverse effects from lead exposure — pregnant women and children younger than 6 years of age — it may be prudent to avoid eating game shot with lead bullets or slugs.

Of course, eating game is a matter of personal choice. After considering all the information, what are your thoughts?

- Jennifer

8 comments posted

blog index
References
  1. Wild game hunting and food safety. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/Features/HuntingSafety/. Accessed Dec. 2, 2009.
  2. Chronic wasting disease. U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dvrd/cwd/. Accessed Dec. 2, 2009.
  3. Health consultation: The potential for ingestion exposure to lead fragments in venison in Wisconsin. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/HAC/pha/LeadFragmentsinVenison/Venison%20and%20Lead%20HC%20110408.pdf. Accessed Dec. 2, 2009.
  4. Hunting with lead: Association between blood lead levels and wild game consumption. Environmental Research. 2009;109(8):952.
  5. North Dakota Lead Exposure Study, October 2008. http://www.rmef.org/NR/rdonlyres/F07627AA-4D94-4CBC-B8FD-4F4F18401303/0/ND_report.pdf. Accessed Dec 2, 2009.
  6. USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 22. U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search. Accessed Dec. 2, 2009.  
MY01079 Dec. 4, 2009

© 1998-2012 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (MFMER). All rights reserved. A single copy of these materials may be reprinted for noncommercial personal use only. "Mayo," "Mayo Clinic," "MayoClinic.com," "EmbodyHealth," "Enhance your life," and the triple-shield Mayo Clinic logo are trademarks of Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.

Advertisement


Text Size: smaller largerlarger